Next: Summary and Conclusion
Up: Unity of Perception
Previous: Uniform Time
  Contents
The coherencies which exist in music have to agree with each other in
any scale and dimension in which they are being perceived. The
auditory experience
which comes from a performance in the way that the sound of
the instrument (a single instrument or an orchestra) matches the music,
gives complete freedom to the listener to choose the scale of audition.
However, it enslaves him or her by providing the same message
at every level. The listener
is free to tune in at any scale of perception. However, the composition
has a single feeling to it. In fact this feeling may change in every
performance. However those different feelings are in turn related to
each other by the integrity of the piece.
A score of a composition is the coding of a musical
idea in some accepted dimensions as parameters for the sake of communication.
Schoenberg says[40, page 220]:
THE TWO-OR-MORE-DIMENSIONAL SPACE IN WHICH MUSICAL IDEAS ARE PRESENTED IS
A UNIT.2.17Though the elements of these ideas appear separate and independent
to the eye and the ear, they reveal their true meaning only through
their co-operation, even as no single word alone can express a thought
without relation to other words. All that happens at any point of this
musical space has more than a local effect. It functions not only in its
own plane, but also in all other directions and planes, and is not without
influence even at remote points. For instance, the effect of progressive
rhythmical subdivision, through what I call `the tendency of the shortest
notes' to multiply themselves, can be observed in every classic
composition.
Such a definition perhaps takes a dimensionless concept such as
the musical idea and projects it onto a plexus of dimensions
for communication. The fact that every part is part of a whole
and abides by global law while at the same time, as Schoenberg
says, ``all that happens at any point of this musical space
has more than a local effect'', can be modeled with self-similar
structures and self-referentiality. It is true that such a model
tries to capture a sense of aesthetics and romantic feeling about
music; however, there is no need to fear since we will never reach
a true self-similar shape since they only exist in infinity.
The idea of self-similarity can also capture the uniformity of time
and perception. Stockhausen has noticed this fact as well, and one of
his acoustical piece, Mantra (1970), may be called a fractal
piece. About it he writes[47, page 57]:
I can give an example of a more recent concept of sequential form, my
composition MANTRA for two pianos and electronic modulation. In
this work I use a 13-note formula, and nothing but this formula
throughout the whole duration of the composition. The formula is
expanded and compressed in its pitch and time intervals, but it is
always the same formula. Each note of the original statement of the
formula has certain characteristics: a periodic repetition, an
accent at the end of the note, an ornament, and so on, these
characteristics are seeds of later development. The structure of the
whole composition is an enlargement in time of that one small
formula to more than 60 minutes, and the sections of the composition
correspond to the notes of the original formula, and their characteristics.
The form is sequential, but with an overall development.
Next: Summary and Conclusion
Up: Unity of Perception
Previous: Uniform Time
  Contents
Shahrokh Yadegari
2001-03-01